Quantum Theory (notes 1)


Having recently investigated the concepts around gravitation (via Special and General Relativity), it’s now time to try to get to grips with Quantum Theory. I’m a Chemist, and the quantum world view is part of my foundational experience (electron quantised energy levels in atoms being the starting point for chemistry). But, I don’t understand it.

I bought and read John Polkinghorne’s Quantum Theory: A Very Short Introduction. I now need to buy another book that introduces the mathematics, and looks at the various consequences of the quantum state of things in more detail. But, my developing understanding of the role of mathematics in physics has received another push along the road of erudition. Here’s where I’m at:

Reality exists in the world (of physics), but we don’t necessarily understand it much (the odd experimental glimpse perhaps). Meanwhile, Pure Mathematicians have been developing all sorts of mathematics (often hundreds of years before), just because they could, and were interested in the maths (no obvious utility at the time). Physicists sometimes realise that a particular mathematics (e.g. Tensors, complex numbers, matrices) might help to describe the physics – they explore this, work out boundary conditions, constraints, and see what pops out. The maths yield possible observable predictions; some of which turn out to be real. Iteration then proceeds, and understanding increases – a new mathematical language emerges which allows reality to be described, explored and investigated. Nobody knew, at the beginning, where this would lead. This is part of the excitement of Physics.

Quantum Theory, then. Boy, bizarre and counter-intuitive. One of my favourite findings (to date) is that combining Quantum Theory and Special Relativity yields the concept of anti-matter! And, that a vacuum is actually a humming hive of activity (although there is nothing there).


3 thoughts on “Quantum Theory (notes 1)

  1. Mr J Dexter

    Let me know how the whole process goes in gaining a greater understanding. I’m ( unsurprisingly) in much the same position and saving this for when I get to retire and use it to keep a brain alive and make up for a good few years of ignorance. Look forward to noting some texts and helpful insights

    1. chemistrypoet Post author

      Thanks, John. My journey with Special and General Relativity was very stimulating, and has given me the courage to try and tackle Quantum. I hope to generate regular blogposts along the way.

      1. Mr J Dexter

        It needs more time and concentration than I can afford to it. TBH not even finished ‘a brief history of time’ properly despite several starts but nice to save for a time I might manage. Good luck w it look forward to the posts

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s